FGRT attended Innovation Enterprise’s most recent conference series in Shanghai on September 6–7. Below, we provide our key takeaways from day one.
FGRT attended the latest conference series organized by Innovation Enterprise on September 6–7 in Shanghai. The conference featured three summits, namely Chief Innovation Officer Summit, Big Data & Analytics Innovation Summit and Digital Marketing & Strategy Innovation Summit.
Anne Chang, Head of Product Design at Google, introduced Design Sprint, a framework created by Google that helps to improve and expedite innovation.
A veteran of product innovation, Chang has launched over 40 products throughout her career—some with great success, and others not so much. As the world continues to change quickly, it has become ever more challenging to design products that meet customers’ needs.
Design Sprint enables product developers to “sprint” through the full development cycle in just five days. The team usually consists of five to seven members, including one design sprint master to act as the facilitator, as well as members from different business units. It features a five-phase framework:
Design Sprint is not limited to internal-use only at Google. The company has made the framework and relevant resources available to the public on its website.
Eddie Cai, Senior Director of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) at GAP, provided his insights about the challenges of digitalization in retail.
Cai began with the popular buzzword “big data,” which he regards as too “big” for retailers—not only does the sheer volume, variety and velocity of data concerned necessitate a huge investment for retailers, but there are also the issues related to data privacy to contend with. Instead, Cai believes internal data—which includes customer profiles, customer engagement, as well as products and channels—is more feasible for retailers to handle.
In addition to data capture and data management, Cai mentioned several other challenges faced by retailers:
Sophia Ong, GM of Strategic Partnership at Tencent Online Media Group (OMG), shared several case studies of using marketing technology to disrupt brand marketing.
Wang Lijie is the Principal Agile Innovation Coach at JD.com. Between 2011 and 2016, JD.com’s gross merchandise volume (GMV) saw rapid growth, going from ¥32.7 billion to ¥658.2 billion in five years. The company’s goal is to one day rank among the top-10 of the Fortune 500; it was ranked 261st in 2017. To achieve this goal, the company is trying to address how to innovate in the fast-changing world. Its answer for the next 12 years—use technology to support innovation.
For JD, there are five key components of a technology-driven intelligent business:
Drivers of JD.com’s Future Growth
The dual drivers of JD.com’s future growth are: 1) organic growth; and 2) business model extension.
In order to expand its ecosystem, JD.com has been investing in other companies, as well as accepting investments from other companies, including Tencent and Walmart.
According to Lijie, the “fourth retail revolution” talked about by JD.com is different from the New Retail propagated by Alibaba. At JD.com, the fourth retail revolution refers to thinking about costs and efficiency to give consumers the best retail experience, and is comprised of the following:
Lijie ended his discussion with what he felt were the three core tenets underpinning JD.com’s spirit of innovation: to solve problems, to go with market trends and needs, and to be humane and provide value to customers.
In the final session of the day, several panelists from the startup ecosystem discussed their experiences, sharing their insights into their collaborations with corporates. The session moderator was Oscar Ramos, Partner at SOSV, a provider of venture capital that runs seven accelerators globally, including Chinaccelerator, HAX and IndieBio. The panelists were:
Why Corporates Should Work with Startups
Quaine stated that startups are an attractive option for corporates wanting exposure to certain emerging technologies, as startups have devoted much time to these emerging technologies and are willing to take risks. Some corporates may not have the resources nor want to build an entire new team from scratch to work on an emerging technology.
Getzel believes speed is a key advantage for startups. He also mentioned that it is common for startups to take a problem in one industry and solve it with a technology in another industry.
Chen believes that startups can create something new and innovate, and drive innovation within a corporate.
Why Are Multinational Corporations so Keen to Partner with a Startup?
Quaine observed that there have been more successful examples within the startup scene recently. Some startups have proven expertise, which has led to the surge in corporates working with startups. Startups may notice trends that big corporates may not, such as in the fashion industry.
Getzel stated there are many shared problems faced by corporates and startups that align them. Startups need to move fast in order to survive. Corporates are aware that startups are getting results faster and thus see them as a good partner.
How to Overcome the Challenges of a Potential Partnership Between a Startup and a Corporate
The consensus among the panelists was that politics in organizations is one of the key challenges to a potential startup-corporate partnership. They believe that such decisions need to be based on data—the more data-driven the decisions are, the less politics are involved.
Quaine believes that corporates need to be clear with the deliverables, as corporates are sometimes unsure of what they want.
What Are the Key Benefits to Startups of Working with Corporates?
Mentorship from corporates is critical. Getzel shared that his company has learned to look at a problem from a different and larger perspective. The panelists agree that one of the reasons startups want to work with corporates is because of their deep connection with industry.
Getzel believes that clear expectations and strategic goal alignment are important. An example he gave was that a startup typically has six to nine months of runway, whereas the sales cycle of a corporate may be longer.
Chen believes that corporates should pay startups fairly and be clear about the goals from the beginning.